<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">David G. Gabor | The Wagner Law Group</title>
    <subtitle type="text">The Wagner Law Group</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-06-08T20:22:13Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com" />
    <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/category/author/david-g-gabor/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.8494995447167898" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2021/06/cropped-wagner-fav-icon-2-32x32.png</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Planning for Family Leave? Read the Fine Print]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2026/03/planning-for-family-leave-read-the-fine-print/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=67927</id>
            <updated>2026-03-12T13:12:22Z</updated>
            <published>2026-03-10T23:08:13Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[FMLA]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Planning for Family Leave? Read the Fine Print – David Gabor and Katherine Brustowicz, Rethinking65, March 10, 2026 (PDF)]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2026/03/planning-for-family-leave-read-the-fine-print/"><![CDATA[<a href="https://rethinking65.com/planning-for-family-leave-read-the-fine-print/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Planning for Family Leave? Read the Fine Print</a> - David Gabor and Katherine Brustowicz, <em>Rethinking65</em>, March 10, 2026 (<a href="/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2026/03/031126Rethinking65ArticleKBrustoiczQuote.pdf" data-wpel-link="internal">PDF</a>)]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[The EEOC Pulled its Harassment Guidance. Now What?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2026/02/the-eeoc-pulled-its-harassment-guidance-now-what/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=67821</id>
            <updated>2026-03-25T19:47:20Z</updated>
            <published>2026-02-06T15:43:18Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[EEOC]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The EEOC Pulled its Harassment Guidance. Now What? – Katherine Brustowicz and David Gabor, panelists, The Wagner Law Group complimentary webinar, March 11, 2026, 12:00 PM – 12:45 PM (EDT) – Click here for recording]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2026/02/the-eeoc-pulled-its-harassment-guidance-now-what/"><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWqc_MDXFC8" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>The EEOC Pulled its Harassment Guidance. Now What?</strong></a> - Katherine Brustowicz and David Gabor, panelists, <em>The Wagner Law Group complimentary webinar</em>, March 11, 2026, 12:00 PM - 12:45 PM (EDT) - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWqc_MDXFC8" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Click here for recording</a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Free Webinar: The impact of the Circuit Court Split on Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/10/free-webinar-the-impact-of-the-circuit-court-split-on-employer-liability-for-third-party-harassment/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=67433</id>
            <updated>2026-02-02T22:39:56Z</updated>
            <published>2025-10-21T15:17:30Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The impact of the Circuit Court Split on Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment – Katherine Brustowicz and David Gabor, panelists, The Wagner Law Group webinar, November 19, 2025, 12:00 – 12:45 PM (EDT) This video is ideal for: • HR professionals • Managers and supervisors • In-house attorneys • Business owners Watch the video on YouTube (Original details and registration)]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/10/free-webinar-the-impact-of-the-circuit-court-split-on-employer-liability-for-third-party-harassment/"><![CDATA[The impact of the Circuit Court Split on Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment - <a title="Attorney Katherine Brustowicz" href="/attorney/brustowicz-katherine/" data-wpel-link="internal">Katherine Brustowicz</a> and <a title="Attorney David Gabor" href="/attorney/gabor-david-g/" data-wpel-link="internal">David Gabor</a>, panelists, <a title="The Wagner Law Group - YouTube Channel" href="https://www.youtube.com/@wagnerlawgroup" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">The Wagner Law Group</a> webinar, November 19, 2025, 12:00 - 12:45 PM (EDT)

This video is ideal for: • HR professionals • Managers and supervisors • In-house attorneys • Business owners

<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/e6vvk8xoz9M?si=M68vQbklYUSaloWp" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>

<a title="Watch On YouTube: The Impact of The Circuit Court Split on Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment -" href="https://youtu.be/e6vvk8xoz9M?si=-Qyj7Y8dBn0xaZP3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Watch the video on YouTube</a>

<hr />

<em>(<a title="registration -- closed" href="https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Q3_8k90jQsiGthwG5uDLJQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Original details and registration</a>)</em>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name> asonneberg</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[14 Attorneys from The Wagner Law Group to be Recognized in 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/08/14-attorneys-from-the-wagner-law-group-to-be-recognized-in-2026-edition-of-the-best-lawyers-in-america/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=67352</id>
            <updated>2025-08-27T20:06:54Z</updated>
            <published>2025-08-21T19:42:50Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[14 Attorneys from The Wagner Law Group to be Recognized in 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America© – The Wagner Law Group Press Release, August 21, 2025 (PDF)]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/08/14-attorneys-from-the-wagner-law-group-to-be-recognized-in-2026-edition-of-the-best-lawyers-in-america/"><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.einpresswire.com/article/841834766/14-attorneys-from-the-wagner-law-group-to-be-recognized-in-2026-edition-of-the-best-lawyers-in-america" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">14 Attorneys from The Wagner Law Group to be Recognized in 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America<sup>©</sup></a> - The Wagner Law Group Press Release, August 21, 2025 (<a href="/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2025/08/082125PressRelease.pdf" data-wpel-link="internal">PDF</a>)]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[HR &#038; Employment Law Updates in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/07/hr-employment-law-updates-in-massachusetts-maine-new-hampshire-and-vermont/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=67086</id>
            <updated>2026-06-02T12:42:19Z</updated>
            <published>2025-07-09T13:31:42Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Family Leave, Maine, Massachusetts, Medical Leave, Paid Family and Medical Leave, PFML, Vermont]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Virgina Peabody I. Massachusetts: Pay Transparency Law Takes Effect In February 2025, the Wagner Law Group reported on amendments to the Massachusetts Equal Pay Act, which included new data reporting obligations and pay transparency rules for Massachusetts employers. Specifically, employers with 100 or more employees are now required to submit…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/07/hr-employment-law-updates-in-massachusetts-maine-new-hampshire-and-vermont/"><![CDATA[By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Virgina Peabody<span style="text-decoration: underline;">
</span>

<strong>I. Massachusetts: Pay Transparency Law Takes Effect</strong>

In February 2025, the Wagner Law Group reported on amendments to the Massachusetts Equal Pay Act, which included new data reporting obligations and pay transparency rules for Massachusetts employers. Specifically, employers with 100 or more employees are now required to submit wage data reports on February 1 of each year. See “<a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iAs2Okts1wnujYxC6i1-X5M1mu2BKXwNFb9AORDhzXX64d9giyn3ZuQzCM-8CqKP_Q_vIVAo_nv9Db7GSAWvRF7mnDhwSTCS4NU8GAprEojIx1zZpOUghP5q645wMJmk-WDSWVpkZJvAt-Gu2SCpP70qerPN-FW6KqVU68IaTWRxcc9ugUrj2SU2l7CCIpdepTRcQDfpA594JUTtrknzC_wos4IaJkVxX6gceoB6TUeRkT5dx3csGBJQf_EUJwgHvFXMa7MS05cBDf_acHuBxAsPQvuDNi7g&amp;c=-RWEpnlH_MrsxX8bG_8s4KQqCBH-joGE8sU05hd28jTrMOkrlMNcew==&amp;ch=NyffSEbwzIRsw5x5xX5ZfYjpvMmnZMkN5M3wcnBFv4gpcfnWhYRa-g==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Massachusetts Pay Transparency Law: Key Provisions and Compliance Timeline</a>.” (<a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iAs2Okts1wnujYxC6i1-X5M1mu2BKXwNFb9AORDhzXX64d9giyn3ZuQzCM-8CqKP0w8rBR-f7Mf6MvmKUYwjtqBSWpUJYncscT_4luwbiHoVpoucl4DANY6jUbzIJ3Zn0CybxWME15Q0cL67KOTgtTajv3TFbF_8iOeXqYURo8k1_n6jWZvMbg==&amp;c=-RWEpnlH_MrsxX8bG_8s4KQqCBH-joGE8sU05hd28jTrMOkrlMNcew==&amp;ch=NyffSEbwzIRsw5x5xX5ZfYjpvMmnZMkN5M3wcnBFv4gpcfnWhYRa-g==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">HB4890</a>).

Beginning on October 29, 2025, new salary posting rules under the Act take effect and apply to Massachusetts employers with 25 or more employees. The new salary posting requirements include: (i) disclosing pay ranges (annual salary or hourly wage) in all job postings – internal or external, and (ii) providing pay range information upon an employee’s request for their current position and/or when offering a promotion or transfer to a new role.

Employers should begin preparing now to ensure their HR departments, job postings, and internal processes are fully compliant well in advance of the deadline and in anticipation of a more transparent labor market. This is also a good time for employers to review the total compensation packages for all employees and/or conduct an audit of job functions and corresponding pay to ensure equity and fairness in the workforce with an eye toward retaining top talent.

<strong>II. Maine: Paid Family &amp; Medical Leave Contributions Begin</strong>

Contributions to Maine’s Paid Family and Medical Leave (“PFML”) Fund began on January 1, 2025. Once the benefits are available, all (full-time and part-time) employees in the private and public sectors (other than federal employees) will be able to take up to 12 weeks of paid leave per year <em>if </em>they earn at least six times the state average weekly wage (“SAWW”) in earnings subject to PFML premiums during the four quarters preceding the benefit year. Self-employed individuals may opt into the program if they wish to do so.

Covered individuals may take leave for reasons that include their own serious health condition, bonding with a new child, caring for a family member with a serious health condition, addressing issues related to a family member’s military service, and for any other reason set forth in 26 M.R.S. § 843(4).

Employers with 15 or more covered employees must pay a premium of 1% of wages to the ME PFML Fund, but may deduct up to 50% of the premium (0.5% of wages) from employees’ wages. Employers with fewer than 15 employees are required to contribute 0.5% and may deduct the full amount from employees’ wages.

Employers can deduct their share of the premium as a business expense. In the case of a pick-up (<em>i.e., </em>where an employer with 15 or more employees chooses to pay the entire 1%, covering both its and its employees’ contributions), the employer may deduct the whole amount as a business expense.

Employers that maintain a private plan providing benefits, rights, and protections that are “substantially equivalent” to the state program may apply for a private plan exemption and need not make contributions to the ME PFML Fund. Such plans must meet specific requirements. For example, a private plan must provide a substantially equivalent wage replacement rate, maximum weekly benefit amount, and duration of leave, and allow for the same covered reasons for taking leave as specified under the state program. If the private plan is self-insured, the employer must furnish a bond to the state with a surety company authorized to transact business in the state. In addition, a contested benefit determination by a private plan is subject to an appeal before the Department of Family and Medical Leave. (see 26 M.R.S. § 850‑H (1), (2), (5)).

<strong> </strong>ME PFML benefits currently will be available starting May 1, 2026. However, due to a high volume of employers electing to establish private plans instead of participating in the state program, the ME PFML is reportedly underfunded. As a result, the Maine Department of Labor has indicated that the start date for benefit availability may be postponed.

<strong>III. New Hampshire: New Nursing Break Requirements</strong><strong> </strong>

Effective July 1, 2025, employers with six or more employees must provide nursing employees with 30-minute unpaid lactation breaks for every three hours of work for up to one year after the birth of a child. The lactation breaks must be provided, regardless of the nursing employee’s classification or whether the break overlaps with regular rest periods. These breaks are for the purpose of “express[ing] breast milk,” which is defined as “the initiation of lactation by manual or mechanical means but shall not include breastfeeding.” NH Rev. Stat § 275:78. The law allows the break to be taken concurrently with any other break the employer already provides. For example, if the employee has a scheduled meal or rest break, the lactation break can run concurrently.

Employers must provide a private space for nursing, other than a bathroom. The space must be within a reasonable walk of the employee’s worksite, unless otherwise mutually agreed, shielded from view, and free from intrusion. The space can be either temporary or permanent, but it must be clean, functional, and equipped with seating and an electrical outlet. The law requires employers to provide notice at the time of hire to all employees of the employer’s lactation break policy. It also requires nursing employees to provide two weeks’ advance notice before using the accommodation. This allows employers time to make the necessary arrangements.

Employers may be exempt from this obligation if they can demonstrate that providing the accommodation imposes “undue hardship”, defined as “significant difficulty or expense when considered in relation to factors such as the size of the business, its financial resources, and the nature and structure of its operation.”  Id.

<strong>IV. Vermont: Pay Transparency Law </strong>

Vermont’s Act Relating to Disclosure of Compensation in Job Advertisements (Act 155) became effective July 1, 2025. Act 155 requires employers with five or more employees and with at least one employee who works in Vermont to include a job’s salary or range of compensation in their job postings. Advertisements for jobs that are primarily compensated on a commission basis must state that the job is commission-based but need not include a salary or an expected compensation range. Further, employers are now required to identify tip-compensated positions as such and include the applicable base wage or range of base wages in job postings.

Vermont’s new pay transparency law is exclusively enforced by the Vermont Attorney General, whose Civil Rights Unit currently enforces Vermont laws on equal pay and fair employment. According to the Attorney General, disclosing the “range of compensation” means disclosing “the minimum and maximum annual salary or hourly wage that the employer, acting in good faith, expects to pay for the advertised job at the time it creates the ad.”  See <a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iAs2Okts1wnujYxC6i1-X5M1mu2BKXwNFb9AORDhzXX64d9giyn3ZuQzCM-8CqKPhyY8dwecd52k0mOe3ICQWZsGfr2F2_oAHGIzlgaJBqWn4GJ3isFFWo00JeZPWxcyzK72Bt_5jWQ_0mhDlG5yJqw0BSrNGy8SyND-X-DOakI2z8bZTsDEEpl2bZmF9rLkthGvgbTMQVIbXx67iaBA_PrSeSYy3yrgzn7K_KMTc8JabCkziCXwbtjn2OkjtrGksbAljEclW6vIjjnAojfCgSiehmdHVvfY86_UwsKtKxc=&amp;c=-RWEpnlH_MrsxX8bG_8s4KQqCBH-joGE8sU05hd28jTrMOkrlMNcew==&amp;ch=NyffSEbwzIRsw5x5xX5ZfYjpvMmnZMkN5M3wcnBFv4gpcfnWhYRa-g==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Final Version of H 704 Guidance (12-31-24).pdf</a>

The new legislation does not cover oral advertisements, general notices of employment opportunities (rather than specific job openings), or job openings for work performed outside Vermont.  However, it does apply to advertisements that describe a remote job calling for work that is predominantly performed either in a Vermont office or other Vermont work location. The ability of employers and workers to negotiate pay during the application or hiring process is also not limited by this act. It requires an employer to be transparent about the compensation or range of compensation for a job at the time that the advertisement is posted.

If you have questions about how these changes may affect your organization or need assistance updating your policies and procedures, <a href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">our Employment Law</a> and Human Resources team is ready to help. Please feel free to reach out to Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody for guidance and support.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[The EEOC and Executive Orders: What Employers Ought to Know about EEO-1 Reporting (Filing Deadline June 24, 2025)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/05/the-eeoc-and-executive-orders-what-employers-ought-to-know-about-eeo-1-reporting-filing-deadline-june-24-2025/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=66499</id>
            <updated>2026-06-02T12:46:14Z</updated>
            <published>2025-05-27T15:27:31Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[EEO-1, EEOC]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) What is EEO-1 Reporting? An EEO-1 Report is a document submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), a federal agency to which covered organizations must report specific demographic characteristics of their workforce, such as race, ethnicity, and sex. EEO-1 reports are filed annually. Who Needs…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/05/the-eeoc-and-executive-orders-what-employers-ought-to-know-about-eeo-1-reporting-filing-deadline-june-24-2025/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant)</strong>

<strong>What is EEO-1 Reporting?</strong>

An EEO-1 Report is a document submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), a federal agency to which covered organizations must report specific demographic characteristics of their workforce, such as race, ethnicity, and sex. EEO-1 reports are filed annually.

<strong>Who Needs to File?</strong>
<ul>
 	<li>Private employers with 100 or more employees.</li>
 	<li>Businesses with under 100 employees, if they are part of a group with a combined total of 100 or more employees.</li>
 	<li>Institutions with at least 50 employees that manage government funds or handle U.S. savings bonds and notes.</li>
 	<li>Federal contractors with 50 or more employees and a contract of $50,000+.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Filing Deadline. </strong>

The 2024 EEO-1 reporting portal opened on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. The deadline to file is Tuesday, June 24, 2025.

<strong>How To File an EEO-1 Report?</strong>

Filers should visit <a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001Keqsoh0VyEUlDXVCS4Xa10sbzQfynlPpeNWgVnffh1N4BG-ZqUlZKHrbKhsjfERVT2qbUiKiFJrtTSrf6-Ao5I_uYUGDaQiEnNJmMsuq-ZVTsW0jLlGFswKsTLlImOsCrTWo_Jx0CxZOVcdimeKMzBGrNNfkACdX&amp;c=RZojOnttq-SEkDS-9D-XBrWnzlBIey40BuBibO57ja7rzztx5bi_BA==&amp;ch=JpDBLEzcn3fY5pA8h9iNLjDElCNkJOOuMr4IqSCjYYQaJUlPe8v26A==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.eeocdata.org/eeo1</a> to access the <em>EEO-1 Component 1 Online Filing System (OFS)</em>.

<strong>The EEOC &amp; Executive Orders.</strong>

The EEO-1 Report serves as a data collection tool for both employers and the EEOC. The report can be used to identify potential patterns of disparate impact and potential disparities within an employer’s workforce. It can also be used to ensure compliance with <a href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">fair employment practices</a> and as an opportunity for employers to take proactive measures to address any issues.

On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order titled “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy.” This order directed all federal agencies, including the EEOC, to deprioritize claims and cases that challenge neutral practices with disparate outcomes based on race, sex, or other protected characteristics. It also revoked certain Presidential approvals of regulations implementing Title VI that were promulgated by the Department of Justice in 1966 and 1973. These regulations prohibited specific types of discriminatory actions by employers receiving federal financial assistance based on race, color, or national origin. The regulations also prohibited the use of neutral policies or practices that have a discriminatory effect on a protected group and required affirmative action to overcome the effects of prior discrimination.

Andrea Lucas, Acting Chair of the EEOC, acknowledged in a recent statement that the EEOC is an executive branch agency and, therefore, plans to comply fully with President Trump’s Executive Order deprioritizing disparate impact claims and prioritizing intentional discrimination claims. Lucas reiterated that the EEOC is committed to preventing and combating unlawful race and sex discrimination, stating that discrimination clearly remains impermissible. It is not entirely clear how the EEOC will differentiate between the types of discrimination claims pending before it, particularly where many charges include claims of both disparate impact and disparate treatment. In addition, while EEO-1 Reports have been used to identify patterns of disparate impact, which will no longer be a priority for the EEOC, they also could be used to identify claims of intentional discrimination. Employers should continue to carefully prepare and submit EEO-1 Reports and proactively address issues where appropriate, even though the EEOC plans to deprioritize disparate impact discrimination claims.

<strong>Need Help with EEO-1 Reporting?</strong>

If you need assistance with EEO-1 reporting, whether ensuring compliance, preparing and submitting your report, or navigating the statutory and regulatory requirements, our Employment Law and Human Resources Team at The Wagner Law Group is here to help. Contact Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody for guidance and a streamlined filing process.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Changes to the Employer-Employee Relationship and What Employers Should Do When ICE Comes Knocking]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/05/recent-changes-to-the-employer-employee-relationship-and-what-employers-should-do-when-ice-comes-knocking/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=66489</id>
            <updated>2026-02-02T22:53:05Z</updated>
            <published>2025-05-15T20:12:52Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[ICE]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Changes to the Employer-Employee Relationship and What Employers Should Do When ICE Comes Knocking Presented by: WLG Employment Law Attorneys, David Gabor and Katherine Brustowicz; and Deirdre Nero, Immigration Attorney at NERO Immigration Law, P.L. The Wagner Law Group Webinar, June 5, 2025, 1;00 – 2:00 PM (EDT) Original registration (closed) and details  ]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/05/recent-changes-to-the-employer-employee-relationship-and-what-employers-should-do-when-ice-comes-knocking/"><![CDATA[Recent Changes to the Employer-Employee Relationship and What Employers Should Do When ICE Comes Knocking
<ul>
 	<li>Presented by: <a title="employment law" href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">WLG Employment Law Attorneys</a>, <a title="David Gabor" href="/attorney/gabor-david-g/" data-wpel-link="internal">David Gabor</a> and <a title="Katherine Brustowicz" href="/attorney/brustowicz-katherine/" data-wpel-link="internal">Katherine Brustowicz</a>; and <a title="Deirdre Nero of NERO Immigration Law" href="https://neroimmigration.com/about-us/deirdrenero/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Deirdre Nero</a>, Immigration Attorney at NERO Immigration Law, P.L.</li>
 	<li style="text-align: left;">The Wagner Law Group Webinar, June 5, 2025, 1;00 - 2:00 PM (EDT)</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pF5McwshSH0?si=pigpg3Ju2fOzSlJG" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<a href="https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Vf5esEw7QYKjHnDxyi_wgQ#/registration" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Original registration (closed) and details</em></a>

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Important Update to the Federal Independent Contractor Test]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/05/important-update-to-the-federal-independent-contractor-test/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=66485</id>
            <updated>2026-06-02T12:44:52Z</updated>
            <published>2025-05-08T13:16:45Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Independent Contractor]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) The Department of Labor (DOL), through its Wage and Hour Division (WHD), issued a Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB No. 2025-1) stating that as of May 1, 2025, it will no longer apply the 2024 Biden-era independent contractor rule in its enforcement of the Fair Labor Standards…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/05/important-update-to-the-federal-independent-contractor-test/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant</strong>)

The Department of Labor (DOL), through its Wage and Hour Division (WHD), issued a Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB No. 2025-1) stating that as of May 1, 2025, it will no longer apply the 2024 Biden-era independent contractor rule in its <em>enforcement</em> of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The 2024 rule set out a six-pronged “economic realities” test to determine whether a worker is an employee covered by the FLSA or an independent contractor, who is not. Overall, the Biden-era rule is pro-employee, meaning that utilizing the six-pronged test is more likely to result in a worker’s being classified as an employee. The six factors are:

1)     Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill;

2)     Investments by the worker and the potential employer;

3)     Degree of permanence of the work relationship;

4)     Nature and degree of control;

5)     Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the putative employer’s business; and

6)     Skill and initiative.

The question of who qualifies as an employee under the FLSA is not new. Near the end of his first term, President Trump’s Administration released what is commonly referred to as the Trump 2021 rule. The Trump 2021 rule emphasized two factors as determinative of a worker’s status:

1)     The nature and degree of the worker’s control over the work, and

2)     The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment.

Compared to the 2024 rule, the Trump 2021 rule was seen as pro-business or pro-employer. It made it easier to classify workers as independent contractors, which generally excluded such workers from FLSA protections. By keeping things simple, it reduced uncertainty. The rule had its critics though, as many argued it tilted things too heavily in favor of businesses.

That brings us to FAB No. 2025-1, issued on May 1. Instead of continuing to uphold the 2024 rule or reverting to the Trump 2021 rule, the DOL and its WHD are reverting to enforcement based on the 2008 version of Fact Sheet #13, which outlined the following seven-factor test:

1)     The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business;

2)     The permanency of the relationship;

3)     The amount of the putative contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment;

4)     The nature and degree of control by the principal;

5)     The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit or loss;

6)     The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor; and

7)     The degree of independent business organization and operation.

It is worth emphasizing that the 2008 framework does not invalidate the 2024 rule. The Biden-era rule remains formally in effect and may apply in private litigation. The DOL, however, will not enforce it in its investigations or when imposing penalties. In effect, the DOL is freezing enforcement of the 2024 rule.

Employers may feel more confident using independent contractors under the 2008 standard, but caution is still warranted. Several states have stricter classification tests (<em>e.g., </em>California’s and Massachusetts’ so-called ABC test which starts with the presumption that all workers are employees) that may expose employers to liability even if they comply with federal standards. These are pitfalls that employers should be wary of, consulting legal counsel to avoid falling into them.

If you have questions about how this enforcement shift may impact your worker classification practices, compliance obligations under the FLSA, or state law exposure, <a href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">our Employment Law</a> and Human Resources Team is here to assist. For strategic guidance and risk assessment, please contact Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant).]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Form I-9: What is It and What’s Changed]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/04/form-i-9-what-is-it-and-whats-changed/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=66379</id>
            <updated>2026-06-02T12:45:32Z</updated>
            <published>2025-04-15T01:14:10Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Form I-9]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[by Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) released a revised Form I-9, dated January 20, 2025. While the updates are minor, understanding both the purpose of the form and the nature of these revisions is essential for compliance. Form I-9 is a document submitted by an…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/04/form-i-9-what-is-it-and-whats-changed/"><![CDATA[<strong>by Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant)</strong>

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) released a revised Form I-9, dated January 20, 2025. While the updates are minor, understanding both the purpose of the form and the nature of these revisions is essential for compliance.

Form I-9 is a document submitted by an employer to the federal government verifying that an employee hired by the employer is authorized to work in the United States. Employers are required to maintain, in a file separate from their personnel file, a properly completed Form I-9 and must be prepared to produce it during an audit or investigation. Noncompliance can result in significant civil fines or criminal penalties, debarment from federal contracts, and reputational harm.

In 2019, USCIS updated its I-9 related penalties:
<ul>
 	<li><u>Paperwork Violations</u>: $230 - $2,292 per form</li>
 	<li><u>Knowingly Hiring Unauthorized Workers</u>:</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 80px;">First offense (per worker): $573 - $4,586</p>
<p style="padding-left: 80px;">Second offense: $4,586 - $11,463</p>
<p style="padding-left: 80px;">Third or subsequent offenses: $6,878 - $22,927</p>

<ul>
 	<li><u>Document Fraud (I-9 Fraud or Misuse)</u>:</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 80px;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">First offense: $400 - $3,195</span></p>
<span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Subsequent offenses: $3,195 - $9,472</span>

<span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">The 2025 updated Form I-9 contains the following changes:</span>
<ul>
 	<li>Section 1, checkbox #4, has been renamed to “An alien authorized to work.”</li>
 	<li>USCIS has revised the descriptions of two List B documents in the Lists of Acceptable Documents.</li>
 	<li>The DHS Privacy Notice has been revised to reflect updated statutory language.</li>
</ul>
The new edition of Form I-9 is available for immediate use and will remain valid through May 31, 2027.

While these updates are minor, they are emblematic of a more comprehensive systematic shift for employer obligations related to immigration reporting and compliance. In December, our Employment and Human Resources (“HR”) Law team issued a news alert informing our clients that employers ought to stay vigilant about Form I-9 reporting requirements, particularly in light of potential policy shifts under a second Trump administration. These updates reaffirm our initial prediction that employers will be under increased scrutiny in fulfilling their immigration reporting requirements.

If you need assistance navigating Form I-9, updating your HR systems, or ensuring compliance with employment eligibility verification requirements, <a href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">our Employment Law</a> and Human Resources Team is here to help. Contact Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) for guidance and support.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Attention Employers: EEO-1 Reporting Deadline Approaching]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/03/attention-employers-eeo-1-reporting-deadline-approaching/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=66221</id>
            <updated>2025-03-31T13:34:20Z</updated>
            <published>2025-03-24T15:18:20Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[EEO-1, EEOC]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) The EEO-1 report for covered employers must be filed with the EEOC by June 4, 2025. Who Needs to File? Private employers with 100+ employees. Businesses with under 100 employees if they are part of a group with a combined total exceeding 100 employees. Institutions with…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/03/attention-employers-eeo-1-reporting-deadline-approaching/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant)</strong>

The EEO-1 report for covered employers must be filed with the EEOC by June 4, 2025.
<h2>Who Needs to File?</h2>
<ul>
 	<li>Private employers with 100+ employees.</li>
 	<li>Businesses with under 100 employees if they are part of a group with a combined total exceeding 100 employees.</li>
 	<li>Institutions with at least 50 employees that manage government funds or handle U.S. savings bonds and notes.</li>
 	<li>Federal contractors with 50+ employees and a contract of $50,000+</li>
</ul>
Note that at present it is unclear whether there will be further guidance for federal contractors.
<h2>Action Steps:</h2>
✔ Confirm if your business meets EEO-1 federal filing requirements.

✔ Submit your EEO-1 report to the EEOC by June 4, 2025.
<h2>Need Help With EEO-1 Reporting?</h2>
If you need assistance with <a title="employment law attorneys" href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">EEO-1 reporting</a> — whether ensuring compliance, preparing and submitting your report, or navigating the requirements — our <a title="employment law professionals" href="/employment-law-team-leaders-and-professionals/" data-wpel-link="internal">Employment Law and Human Resources Team</a> at The Wagner Law Group is here to help. Contact Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, or Virginia Peabody for guidance and a streamlined filing process.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Advisory Firms’ DEI Programs May Be Scrutinized]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/02/advisory-firms-dei-programs-may-be-scrutinized/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65994</id>
            <updated>2025-05-29T18:36:02Z</updated>
            <published>2025-02-21T15:21:40Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[DEI]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Advisory Firms’ DEI Programs May Be Scrutinized – Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine and David Gabor, Rethinking65, February 21, 2025 (PDF)]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/02/advisory-firms-dei-programs-may-be-scrutinized/"><![CDATA[<a href="https://rethinking65.com/advisory-firms-must-comply-with-job-related-executive-orders/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Advisory Firms’ DEI Programs May Be Scrutinized</a> - Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine and David Gabor, <em>Rethinking65</em>, February 21, 2025 (<a href="/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2025/02/022125rethinking65article.pdf" data-wpel-link="internal">PDF</a>)]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Massachusetts Pay Transparency Law: Key Provisions and Compliance Timeline]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/02/massachusetts-pay-transparency-law-key-provisions-and-compliance-timeline/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65929</id>
            <updated>2025-03-31T13:37:54Z</updated>
            <published>2025-02-12T20:18:21Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Pay Transparency]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) On February 1, 2025, a new law regarding salary posting requirements went into effect for all Massachusetts employers with 25 or more employees. “An Act Relative to Salary Range Transparency” amends the Massachusetts Equal Pay Act (“MEPA”) by adding data reporting obligations and new pay transparency rules.…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/02/massachusetts-pay-transparency-law-key-provisions-and-compliance-timeline/"><![CDATA[<strong>Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant)</strong>

On February 1, 2025, a new law regarding salary posting requirements went into effect for all Massachusetts employers with 25 or more employees. “An Act Relative to Salary Range Transparency” amends the Massachusetts Equal Pay Act (“MEPA”) by adding data reporting obligations and new pay transparency rules. Gov. Healy signed the act on July 31, 2024, and stated that the law aims to address pay disparities. Some provisions took effect on February 1, 2025, and the remaining provisions will take effect on October 29, 2025.

Massachusetts employers with 25 or more employees must abide by the new salary posting requirements. Those requirements include: (i) disclosing pay ranges (annual salary or hourly wage) in all job postings – internal or external, and (ii) providing pay range information upon an employee’s request for their current position and/or when offering a promotion or transfer to a new role.

Massachusetts employers with 100 or more employees must submit additional reports to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. EEO-1 data reports are to be sent by February 1 of <em>each </em>year. EEO-3, EEO-4, and EEO-5 reporting requirements rotate biennially, depending on whether the year is odd or even:
<ul>
 	<li>In odd-numbered years (2025, 2027, etc.):
<ul>
 	<li>EEO-3 and EEO-5 reports are due on February 1.</li>
</ul>
</li>
 	<li>In even-numbered years (2026, 2028, etc.):
<ul>
 	<li>EEO-4 reports are due on February 1.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Employers should note that the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development (“EOLWD”) will publish industry aggregate wage and workforce data. However, individual wage data reports are <em>not </em>public records.
<table width="624">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="105"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="519"><strong>Requirement</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Feb. 1, 2025</td>
<td width="519">Employers must begin submitting wage data reports.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Apr. 1, 2025</td>
<td width="519">The Secretary of the Commonwealth will provide initial wage data reports.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">June 1, 2025</td>
<td width="519">First publication of aggregate wage data reports.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Oct. 29, 2025</td>
<td width="519">Full implementation of the law.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Feb. 1, 2026</td>
<td width="519">Additional employer reporting requirements take effect.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The Attorney General’s office has exclusive authority to enforce this law. Any covered employer that fails to submit the wage data reports and/or fails to include salary ranges in job postings, promotions, and upon request will face the following penalties:
<ul>
 	<li>1st offense: Warning</li>
 	<li>2nd offense: Fine up to $500</li>
 	<li>3rd offense: Fine up to $1,000</li>
 	<li>4th and subsequent offenses: Higher penalties under Section 27(c) of Chapter 149</li>
</ul>
Note that during the first two years after the law’s effective date, employers have two business days after notice of a violation to correct defects before fines are imposed. In other words, all violations will have a two-business-day grace period to fix issues before penalties are imposed.

If you would like to discuss how Massachusetts’ new <a title="employment law-employer attorneys" href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">Pay Transparency</a> law may impact your organization – whether in ensuring compliance with salary disclosure requirements, preparing wage data reports, or mitigating potential penalties – please reach out to our <a title="employment professionals" href="/employment-law-team-leaders-and-professionals/" data-wpel-link="internal">Employment Law and Human Resources Team</a>: Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, and Virginia Peabody of The Wagner Law Group.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Training Management for Accommodations]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/02/training-management-for-accommodations/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65879</id>
            <updated>2025-03-31T13:57:35Z</updated>
            <published>2025-02-05T12:49:31Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[accommodations]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Training Management for Accommodations – David Gabor, Radio Entrepreneurs interview, February 5, 2025 Legal Guidance For Your Employment Law Needs We offer in-depth and personalized attention to businesses nationwide. If you are ready to meet with our experienced employment law team and see how we can help you. Contact our nationwide offices online or call to schedule your initial consultation.]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/02/training-management-for-accommodations/"><![CDATA[<a title="YouTube video: Training Management for Accommodations" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcGJ22iss3A" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Training Management for Accommodations</a> - David Gabor, <em>Radio Entrepreneurs</em> interview, February 5, 2025

<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CcGJ22iss3A?si=FP-PfeZ90CZ0O6Sd" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<h2>Legal Guidance For Your Employment Law Needs</h2>
We offer in-depth and personalized attention to businesses nationwide. If you are ready to meet with our experienced <a title="employment law team" href="/employment-law-team-leaders-and-professionals/" data-wpel-link="internal">employment law team</a> and see how we can help you. Contact our nationwide offices <a href="#form" data-wpel-link="internal">online</a> or call [nap_phone id="LOCAL-REGULAR-NUMBER-Boston Phone"] to schedule your initial consultation.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Executive Orders Addressing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/01/executive-orders-addressing-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-initiatives/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65810</id>
            <updated>2025-03-31T14:18:31Z</updated>
            <published>2025-01-29T21:06:26Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[DEI]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) Last week, President Trump signed two executive orders (the “Trump Executive Orders” or “Orders”) repealing diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) and diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (“DEIA”) initiatives. The Trump Executive Orders require the federal government and federal contractors to terminate all discriminatory programs explicitly including…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/01/executive-orders-addressing-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-initiatives/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant)</strong>

Last week, President Trump signed two executive orders (the “Trump Executive Orders” or “Orders”) repealing diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) and diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (“DEIA”) initiatives. The Trump Executive Orders require the federal government and federal contractors to terminate <span style="text-decoration: underline;">all discriminatory programs</span> explicitly including DEI and DEIA mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities <span style="text-decoration: underline;">under whatever name they appear</span>. They also require all federal agencies to encourage private-sector <a title="employment law attorneys for businesses" href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">employers</a> to terminate their discriminatory practices, including “race-and sex-based preferences,” and DEI mandates, policies, programs, and activities.

The Trump Executive Orders make clear that employment decisions should be based on merit, aptitude, hard work, and determination without taking into consideration whether or not the individual is in a protected class. They also rescind Executive Order 11246 and the regulations promulgated under it that previously required the federal government to take affirmative action and prohibited federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

Accordingly, on January 25, 2025, the Acting Secretary of Labor ordered Department of Labor employees to end all investigative and enforcement activity under Executive Order 11246 and to cease and desist from all related activities with respect to pending cases, conciliation agreements, investigations, complaints, and any other enforcement-related or investigative activity under Executive Order 11246. Federal contractors have 90 days to comply with the Trump Executive Orders.

NOTE: While the Trump Executive Orders are quite broad and do not define illegal or discriminatory programs per se, they clearly state that rebranding a DEI or DEIA initiative would not be acceptable. In addition, the Trump Executive Orders do not provide any specifics on how to measure “merit, aptitude, hard work, and determination” in the context of employment decisions. Without any guidance from the federal government, it is not yet possible to determine the full scope of the prohibitions and what, if any, practices would be consistent with the Orders.
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">I. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Federal Contractors and Subcontractors</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">In accordance with the Orders, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) must immediately stop: (i) promoting diversity, (ii) requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to comply with affirmative action, and (iii) encouraging federal contractors and subcontractors to maintain balanced workplaces based on race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Federal contractors and subcontractors may not consider race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin in ways that violate federal civil rights laws in their employment, procurement, and contracting practices.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Furthermore, federal contractors and grant awards must include language stating that the contractor agrees to comply with applicable federal anti-discrimination laws. The contractor must also certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">II. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Private-sector Employers</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">The Attorney General must, within 120 days, provide a report to the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy with recommendations to encourage private sector employers to end illegal discrimination and preferences. Among other things, the report must provide a strategic enforcement plan that: (i) identifies key areas of concern, (ii) identifies the most egregious and discriminatory companies in each area of concern, (iii) provides strategies to deter illegal discrimination and preferences, and (iv) identifies litigation that would be appropriate for federal lawsuits, intervention, or statements of interest. Each relevant agency must list up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large non-profits, foundations with assets of $500,000,000 or more, state and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher education with endowments over $1 billion.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">III. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Educational Institutions</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Within 120 days after the issuance of the Orders, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education must provide guidance regarding measures and practices to comply with Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181 (2023) which found that race-based affirmative action plans used for college admissions (except military academies) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">IV. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Exceptions</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">The Trump Executive Orders indicate a possible exception in the case of employment and contracting preferences for veterans. They also do not prevent state or local governments, federal contractors, or federally-funded state and local educational agencies or institutions of higher education from engaging in First Amendment-protected speech, and they do not prohibit federally-funded institutions of higher education from teaching, advocating for, endorsing, or promoting unlawful employment or contracting practices prohibited by the Trump Executive Orders.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">V. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Takeaways</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Because the scope of the Trump Executive Orders is quite broad, employers should, with assistance from legal counsel, carefully review all their Human Resources practices (e.g., hiring, promoting, mentoring, etc.) to identify any policies, procedures or practices that may be perceived as including illegal discrimination and preferences under federal law. In addition, employers should continue to monitor guidance from the federal government regarding the scope and application of the Trump Executive Orders and perform regular training for managers and supervisors accordingly.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">If necessary, Human Resources practices should be modified, with advice from legal counsel, to comply with the Orders. However, employers should be mindful that other federal statutes, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and individual state anti-discrimination laws still apply. Employers should train managers and supervisors so that they understand that, even though affirmative action and DEI initiatives may not be permitted, Title VII and other federal, state, and local statutes still apply.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Complying with Title VII may not be as straightforward as it has been in the past. Discrimination claims may become more complex. For example, a company promotes a woman instead of a man. The man files a complaint because he feels he deserves/merits the promotion more than the woman because he has more education or went to better schools. The company hired the woman even though she does not have as much education because she has more job-related experience. Employment decisions will need to be carefully documented to demonstrate that such actions are based on merit and/or other factors unrelated to race and sex and not based on illegal discrimination or preferences. To mitigate potential litigation, employers should carefully document Human Resources actions by explaining the business need for such action.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">In the past, employers have made decisions because one individual is a better fit based on personality. This is a purely subjective opinion and should be carefully documented to demonstrate that the decision is not discriminatory.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Furthermore, employers may face more litigation if individuals who were not historically protected by anti-discrimination laws may now be able to file claims of discrimination based on their race or sex.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">VI. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Conclusion</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">The Trump Executive Orders will have a significant impact on federal contractors and subcontractors, private employers, and educational institutions. The scope of the changes will be clearer when guidance is issued. In the meantime, many private employers should review their programs in case they become the subject of an audit or investigation. Such a review would also be beneficial in case of litigation.</p>
We will continue to monitor developments and provide alerts as more information becomes available.

If you would like to further discuss the impact of the Trump Executive Orders on your organization, please reach out to our <a title="Employment Law professionals" href="/employment-law-team-leaders-and-professionals/" data-wpel-link="internal">Employment Law and Human Resources Team</a>: Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff, and Virginia Peabody (Senior Consultant) of The Wagner Law Group.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Federal Court Awards $359,000 in FLSA/OSHA Retaliation Case: Lessons Learned for Employers]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/01/federal-court-awards-359000-in-flsa-osha-retaliation-case-lessons-learned-for-employers/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65776</id>
            <updated>2025-03-31T14:25:37Z</updated>
            <published>2025-01-24T12:17:29Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Department of Labor, DOL, FLSA, OSHA]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In December 2023, Su v. Milford Sports Bars, LLC, a noteworthy case, concluded with a ruling in favor of the U.S. Department of Labor, resulting in a payment of $359,000. The court awarded damages including back pay, interest, emotional distress damages, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Occupational Safety and…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/01/federal-court-awards-359000-in-flsa-osha-retaliation-case-lessons-learned-for-employers/"><![CDATA[In December 2023, <em>Su v. Milford Sports Bars, LLC</em>, a noteworthy case, concluded with a ruling in favor of the U.S. Department of Labor, resulting in a payment of <strong>$359,000</strong>. The court awarded damages including back pay, interest, emotional distress damages, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”). <em>Su v. Milford Sports Bars, LLC</em> was recently highlighted by the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Boston Regional Solicitor’s Office as a case of particular import. This news alert examines specific steps employers should take to bolster their protections against retaliation claims asserted under the FLSA and OSHA.

The facts of the case are straightforward. The Defendants operated Champions Grill and Bar in Milford, Connecticut. In January 2022, the Defendants fired several employees shortly after those employees inquired about their compensation and spoke with an OSHA inspector who visited the restaurant the following day. One of the Defendants even threatened to fire any employees who complained about being paid or who spoke with OSHA or the DOL. In addition, the Defendants failed to pay some of the terminated employees for extra work they had completed before their termination.

The temporal connection between the protected activity -- inquiring about their pay and speaking with an OSHA inspector -- and the adverse action was evident in this case. The court had no trouble finding a causal connection because the events occurred on the same day or within a few days of each other, and no other explanation was provided. That being the case, the court found that Milford Sports Bars violated FLSA (Section 15(a)(3)) and OSHA (Section 11(c)) -- both of which are statutes that protect against retaliation by an employer. It is worth noting that the FLSA violation was also based on the employers’ retaliation against the employees’ requests for their unpaid wages.

This is the first case addressing both FLSA and OSHA retaliation claims in a single action. It exemplifies aggressive DOL enforcement and coordination across wage/hour and safety issues. Employers must comply with wage-and-hour and workplace safety obligations, encouraging open communication and training to prevent similar exposures.

First, conducting internal policy reviews and training is crucial. Second, employers must work closely with their counsel to perform compliance checkups. Third, last but not least, employers must execute routine safety checks and <em>address issues as they arise</em>. Employers should think twice and consult with counsel before taking adverse action following an employee’s protected activities, such as those involving wages and safety.

If you have questions about anti-retaliation policies, wage-and-hour compliance, or workplace safety obligations, please contact David Gabor, Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, or Johanna Matloff of The Wagner Law Group’s <a title="Employment Law and Human Resources" href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">Employment Law and Human Resources practice</a>. For more information, please visit our website at <a title="The Wagner Law Group" href="/" data-wpel-link="internal">www.wagnerlawgroup.com</a>.

[author] [author_image timthumb='on']https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2021/07/David-Gabor.jpg[/author_image] [author_info]David C. Gabor leads the firm's Labor, Employment &amp; HR practice. He represents clients in the areas of litigation, negotiation of contracts, handling compliance issues, the creation of corporate infrastructure, the drafting of policies, training of employees and leading companies towards organizational excellence. [/author_info] [/author]

[author] [author_image timthumb='on']https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2021/07/Katherine-Brustowicz.jpg[/author_image] [author_info]Katherine Brustowicz focuses on Employment Law &amp; Human Resources, Labor Law, and Civil Litigation. Katherine's practice includes drafting employment-related policies and agreements, conducting employee and management training, and representing employers during audits.[/author_info] [/author]

[author] [author_image timthumb='on']https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2023/11/Johanna-L-Matloff.png[/author_image] [author_info]Johanna Matloff is an experienced litigator in disputes involving ERISA and employment benefits as well as employment, insurance, non-profit organizations, complex torts, nursing homes, and consumer and home improvement products liability. Her ERISA litigation experience includes ERISA preemption issues, benefit claims, plan benefit calculation matters, as well as breach of fiduciary duty claims.[/author_info] [/author]]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Employers: Prepare for New Laws and Regulations Under President Trump]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/01/employers-prepare-for-new-laws-and-regulations-under-president-trump/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65784</id>
            <updated>2025-03-31T14:31:28Z</updated>
            <published>2025-01-17T13:41:33Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Employers: Prepare for New Laws and Regulations Under President Trump – Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, and Johanna Matloff, The Wagner Law Group webinar, February 13, 2025, 1:00 – 2:00 PM (EST) Learn More About Our Employment Law Practice If you have questions about new employment laws and regulations, please contact The Wagner Law Group’s Employment Law and Human…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2025/01/employers-prepare-for-new-laws-and-regulations-under-president-trump/"><![CDATA[<a title="Watch on YouTube: Employers: Prepare for New Laws and Regulations Under President Trump" href="https://youtu.be/fo_AceXb4os" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Employers: Prepare for New Laws and Regulations Under President Trump</a> - Katherine Brustowicz, Denise Chicoine, David Gabor, and Johanna Matloff, The Wagner Law Group webinar, February 13, 2025, 1:00 - 2:00 PM (EST)
<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fo_AceXb4os?si=RP9M0v1YSoZXw-gQ" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
<h2>Learn More About Our Employment Law Practice</h2>
If you have questions about new <a title="employment law-employer attorneys" href="/employment-law/" data-wpel-link="internal">employment laws</a> and regulations, please contact The Wagner Law Group’s <a title="Employment Law and Human Resources" href="/employment-law-team-leaders-and-professionals/" data-wpel-link="internal">Employment Law and Human Resources professionals</a> at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-REGULAR-NUMBER-Boston Phone"] or <a href="#form">online</a>.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[I-9 Compliance and Audits Under Forthcoming Intensified Enforcement: Why Employers Should Act Now]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/12/i-9-compliance-and-audits-under-forthcoming-intensified-enforcement-why-employers-should-act-now/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65680</id>
            <updated>2024-12-19T13:59:39Z</updated>
            <published>2024-12-19T13:59:39Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[By David Gabor, Katherine Brustowicz, Virginia Peabody and Craig White With the incoming Administration prioritizing the deportation of illegal immigrants, employers across the country are preparing for a surge in I-9 audits and vigilant reporting enforcement as violations of the I-9 process and paperwork will soon be under higher scrutiny. On June 28, 2024, DHS announced the following fine schedule:…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/12/i-9-compliance-and-audits-under-forthcoming-intensified-enforcement-why-employers-should-act-now/"><![CDATA[<strong>By David Gabor, Katherine Brustowicz, Virginia Peabody and Craig White</strong>

With the incoming Administration prioritizing the deportation of illegal immigrants, employers across the country are preparing for a surge in I-9 audits and vigilant reporting enforcement as violations of the I-9 process and paperwork will soon be under higher scrutiny.

On June 28, 2024, DHS announced the following fine schedule:
<ul>
 	<li>I-9 paperwork violations: $281 to $2,789 per Form I-9</li>
 	<li>Knowingly employing unauthorized alien:
<ul>
 	<li>First Offense $698 to $5,579 per violation</li>
 	<li>Second Offense: $5,579 to $13,946 per violation</li>
 	<li>Third or Higher Offense: $8,369 to $27,894 per violation</li>
</ul>
</li>
 	<li>E-Verify Employers – Failure to inform DHS of continuing employment following final non-confirmation: $973 to $1,942 per relevant employee</li>
</ul>
These steep penalties are avoidable. Now is the perfect time for employers to conduct self-audits and ensure paperwork is in proper order. Conducting a self-audit of current Form I-9s is a critical first step toward ensuring compliance and mitigating risks. Proper training of on-boarding staff in how to fill out Form I-9s and verify required documentation is essential.

Employers have several legal obligations and responsibilities for Form I-9 compliance. The following list, while not exhaustive, illustrates the complexities and importance of proper Form I-9 compliance. As of the publication of this newsletter, employers are required to:
<ol style="list-style-type: lower-roman;">
 	<li>complete Section 2 of the Form I-9 within three business days of the employee’s first day of employment;</li>
 	<li>examine original, unexpired documents presented by the employee that establish both identity and authorization to work in the United States;</li>
 	<li>retain completed Form I-9s for at least three years from the date of hire or one year after the termination of employment, whichever is later; and</li>
 	<li>in the case of certain non-citizen employees, timely reverify employment authorization no later than the date on which employment authorization expires.</li>
</ol>
If you have questions about Form I-9 compliance, reporting or recordkeeping requirements, please contact David Gabor or Katherine Brustowicz of The Wagner Law Group’s Employment Law and Human Resources practice. For more information, please visit our website at <a href="http://www.wagnerlawgroup.com" data-wpel-link="internal">www.wagnerlawgroup.com</a>.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by The Wagner Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Overtime Exemption Update: Judge Vacates DOL Rule Increasing Overtime Salary Threshold]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/11/overtime-exemption-update-judge-vacates-dol-rule-increasing-overtime-salary-threshold/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65534</id>
            <updated>2024-11-20T16:15:28Z</updated>
            <published>2024-11-20T16:15:28Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[overtime]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Exempt or not exempt, that is the question. It is not an easy question to answer, and it did not get any easier to answer when U.S. District Judge Sean D. Jordan vacated the Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule on overtime compensation (“Overtime Rule”) on November 15, 2024 in  The cases are Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor et al.,…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/11/overtime-exemption-update-judge-vacates-dol-rule-increasing-overtime-salary-threshold/"><![CDATA[Exempt or not exempt, that is the question. It is not an easy question to answer, and it did not get any easier to answer when U.S. District Judge Sean D. Jordan vacated the Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule on overtime compensation (“Overtime Rule”) on November 15, 2024 in  The cases are Texas v. U.S. Department of Labor et al., case number <a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001f8UfjaZjiyi1wEL5NYnPrzCVSVupTwLDJdBFZkeFYnNgyspmk_NpySn3osnBEhMUr1Yb4WQWCVRnOL7I_IvCp0HmDfO25q_FPM-MhtvMDKu9fAi3KSg6jytP_zPwcGt76xNfzCpmmgBLn_wX_G9GivgHb70YZgNhEmRWFBs3b0Ku8a0r4W_Jk_SKieG2J21y&amp;c=rsyI7sxX6EApjxJwqg7gzKvOQ0Svz9je5G-FhIj-gfYmbrejKNSCJg==&amp;ch=XenuKI_ZcSQCL3Fj5VzrYK1gZ0DCRvNkavdEjYtoUJNgxrh4u1QkfA==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">4:24-cv-00499</a>, and Plano Chamber of Commerce et al. v. U.S. Department of Labor et al., case number <a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001f8UfjaZjiyi1wEL5NYnPrzCVSVupTwLDJdBFZkeFYnNgyspmk_NpySn3osnBEhMUiUoNEiHn9pxVw6S11M5bdE3DBwSx2hBNI_21hJOwzCzSXyWtFLymQoOgP9jwxnuRnducdMyNczUZ7BuSJhArm5dZE3u6aXQq99uLDrUIaFzlZSnua1YzuKPUwpcI-Aah&amp;c=rsyI7sxX6EApjxJwqg7gzKvOQ0Svz9je5G-FhIj-gfYmbrejKNSCJg==&amp;ch=XenuKI_ZcSQCL3Fj5VzrYK1gZ0DCRvNkavdEjYtoUJNgxrh4u1QkfA==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">4:24-cv-00468</a>, in the <a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001f8UfjaZjiyi1wEL5NYnPrzCVSVupTwLDJdBFZkeFYnNgyspmk_NpySn3osnBEhMU3X2Gi-6UjJUYmrLobheMQIGH8wLIa9T6YYDo8myFX2BbiOn359AJuiFlhluPwuBLI9sRad6mTLh55St37wZ_sYY-17gc1jiVUuNnuFW5q43ivt7ZimdKLhyO2ISOadznxTGuCbzAxPxsAfqmzouH9vgTHmPB8UElPGZvQZDn69w=&amp;c=rsyI7sxX6EApjxJwqg7gzKvOQ0Svz9je5G-FhIj-gfYmbrejKNSCJg==&amp;ch=XenuKI_ZcSQCL3Fj5VzrYK1gZ0DCRvNkavdEjYtoUJNgxrh4u1QkfA==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas</a>.

An employee can be properly classified as exempt when they meet certain criteria under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). These include earning at least $684 per week and working in a role that falls under exemptions such as those for administrative, executive, professional, and outside sales employees.

On April 23, 2024, the DOL had proposed a significant increase in the amount of pay an employee needs to receive to be exempt from overtime pay at time and a half. Under the proposed rule, the minimum salary threshold for exempt employees would increase from $684 per week to $844 per week, effective July 1, 2024, and then to $1,128 per week on January 1, 2025. Employers who were aware of the proposed changes to the salary threshold were forced to adjust the compensation offered to some employees in order to maintain their exemption from overtime pay.

The state of Texas along with several business organizations sued to block the Overtime Rule. Judge Jordan vacated the Overtime Rule based on several factors including: (a) an overemphasis on salary level over duties, (b) exceeding statutory authority, (c) violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, (d) similarity to the 2016 blocked rule, and (e) conflict with both the text of the FLSA and the DOL’s longstanding policy.

This development impacts steps that employers should take regarding their pay practices and future hiring decisions. While it is possible to claw back salary increases made because of the DOL’s Overtime Rule, any such action could lead to unwanted turnover and significant morale issues. Employers should also be careful not to offer new hires the compensation offered to employees prior to the implementation of the Overtime Rule. For example, if employees in a particular position were being paid $700 per week and were raised to $900 per week because of the Overtime Rule, new hires would have to be paid $900 per week if the roles and experience are comparable. This would avoid the risk of a claim of unequal pay or disparate treatment.

If you have any questions about overtime exemption compliance or need assistance with employee classification and compliance issues, please contact David Gabor or Katherine Brustowicz of The Wagner Law Group’s Employment Law and Human Resources practice. For more information, please visit our website at <a href="https://nh6bttcab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001f8UfjaZjiyi1wEL5NYnPrzCVSVupTwLDJdBFZkeFYnNgyspmk_NpyRcySG7tPyrVhBLy8KUc4nprjdfc_HRN3GU58dmwDDXDI-iaPIZnv9fNp3HO_W9vZEfasr6dJUmY1NDBS2eaTVxrOtXdM3_yYx7-Q2BeEEIh&amp;c=rsyI7sxX6EApjxJwqg7gzKvOQ0Svz9je5G-FhIj-gfYmbrejKNSCJg==&amp;ch=XenuKI_ZcSQCL3Fj5VzrYK1gZ0DCRvNkavdEjYtoUJNgxrh4u1QkfA==" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.wagnerlawgroup.com</a>.

[author] [author_image timthumb='on']https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2021/07/David-Gabor.jpg[/author_image] [author_info]David C. Gabor leads the firm's Labor, Employment &amp; HR practice. He represents clients in the areas of litigation, negotiation of contracts, handling compliance issues, the creation of corporate infrastructure, the drafting of policies, training of employees and leading companies towards organizational excellence. [/author_info] [/author]

[author] [author_image timthumb='on']https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1101401/2021/07/Katherine-Brustowicz.jpg[/author_image] [author_info]Katherine Brustowicz focuses on Employment Law &amp; Human Resources, Labor Law, and Civil Litigation. Katherine's practice includes drafting employment-related policies and agreements, conducting employee and management training, and representing employers during audits.[/author_info] [/author]]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by keithsalustro</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Wagner Law Group Virtual Lunch &#038; Learn: How to Reduce Employer Risk From Hire To Fire]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/10/the-wagner-law-group-virtual-lunch-learn-how-to-reduce-employer-risk-from-hire-to-fire/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65244</id>
            <updated>2024-10-16T14:26:39Z</updated>
            <published>2024-10-15T14:23:03Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Wagner Law Group Virtual Lunch & Learn: How to Reduce Employer Risk From Hire To Fire – Katherine Brustowicz, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Denise Chicoine, November 13, 2024, 1:00 – 2:00 PM (EST) and November 21, 2024, 2:00 to 3:00 PM (EST) – Click here to register for November 13, 2024 event – Click here to register for…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/10/the-wagner-law-group-virtual-lunch-learn-how-to-reduce-employer-risk-from-hire-to-fire/"><![CDATA[The Wagner Law Group Virtual Lunch &amp; Learn: How to Reduce Employer Risk From Hire To Fire - Katherine Brustowicz, David Gabor, Johanna Matloff and Denise Chicoine, November 13, 2024, 1:00 - 2:00 PM (EST) and November 21, 2024, 2:00 to 3:00 PM (EST) - <a href="https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_QCQxxbhpR2qRZZ6PInh4Pg#/registration" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Click here to register for November 13, 2024 event</a> - <a href="https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WYfIuiIvSUSHNemt7gaTow#/registration" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Click here to register for November21, 2024</a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by WLG</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Don’t Get Caught Off Guard &#8211; What Managers Should Know Before a Request for Leave or an Accommodation is Made]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/10/dont-get-caught-off-guard-what-managers-should-know-before-a-request-for-leave-or-an-accommodation-is-made/" />
            <id>https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/?p=65237</id>
            <updated>2024-10-15T16:21:00Z</updated>
            <published>2024-10-11T16:17:31Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Don’t Get Caught Off Guard – What Managers Should Know Before a Request for Leave or an Accommodation is Made – David Gabor and Katherine Brustowicz, The Wagner Law Group free webinar, November 19, 2024, 1:00 – 1:30 PM (EST) – Click here for details and registration]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.wagnerlawgroup.com/blog/2024/10/dont-get-caught-off-guard-what-managers-should-know-before-a-request-for-leave-or-an-accommodation-is-made/"><![CDATA[Don’t Get Caught Off Guard - What Managers Should Know Before a Request for Leave or an Accommodation is Made - David Gabor and Katherine Brustowicz, The Wagner Law Group free webinar, November 19, 2024, 1:00 - 1:30 PM (EST) - <em><a href="https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_dtamkkUITkqrMFz8zcWymA#/registration" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Click here for details and registration</a></em>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>